|
|
WHY TODDLER CHILDREN OF SUPREME COURT NOMINEES SHOULD NEITHER BE SEEN NOR HEARD.photo opportunity wise, until confirmed, that is.
|
While much is being made of Supreme Court nominee John Roberts Senior's
judicial skills, the matter of his parenting choices seems to have slipped
under the radar of groups more focused on fighting for disclosure of his
position on issues like Roe vs Wade. Though called "one of best legal
minds of his generation" from winning most of the cases he argued before
the Supreme Court on decisions potentially affecting our children, Roberts
may have made a public gaffe affecting his own. The Judge having answered
challengers that "Roe v. Wade is the settled law of the land," reinforces,
with his decision to bring pre-schoolers, 5 and 4, past their bedtime,
into politic's media spotlight kicking off a job interview for their dad,
the laws of child rearing are as individual as common sense, telling as to
where Robert's priorities lie.
While setting the children down for a nap may have been a consideration
facilitating the children staying up late to share the big moment, there
is the reality their next days schedules could be offset, and, as the
nation saw in John Junior age 4, the children could be filled with vim,
vigor and out of hand. Mom and Dad stood while Jack entertained the
nation. The film crew captured Mrs. Roberts strong arming Jack down the
red carpet departure out of camera view. Acknowledging parenting styles
are individual., Jane Roberts did not adress her son's attention seeking
antics with game playing, hugs, kisses or, better yet, gentle
admonishment.
Within moments of Jack John stealing his father's limelight, talking heads
reaching for a story made JJ the talk of prime time broadcast as there was
little else to discuss. Jane standing still, the little girl clinging
behind her mom's skirt. The judge, described as the man you'd be proud to
know, effortlessly delivered his memorized speech without notice to his
son on what bottom line amounts to a job interview the world is watching.
But isn't that the point of being a parent. Noticing our children, first,
and foremost and above all else, after all aren't they our mirrors.
Early comparisons have John Jr being compared to Camelot's late Prince.
The memorable photo of John John, wearing little boy shorts and ankle
socks while saluting his father's coffin passing by is not a platform upon
which to make a comparison. The late Mrs Kennedy did as best as she could
to raise her children out of media's glare. One wishes the Roberts would
have followed the example of the First Lady and President, Princess Diana
and others, and sheltered the children from the cameras, at least until
they came of age, or at least waited to bring the children forth, after he
is confirmed. The Roberts decision to make the night a family affair may
have fast tracked their seer suckered and saddle shoed four year old on to
a path he is not deserving. Media and classmates have a way of being
cruel. Monikers can last a lifetime. Prince William oft referred to with
his mum's nickname "Wills," while Harry, known less graciously as the
"spare to the heir," is chased with the expectation he will make a gaffe.
One can only hope the parents will be disciplined not the child too young
to know anything other than how to be a four year old boy, and that he did
well. Democrats alarmed at Robert's reputation for being conservative, may
warm at his appeal to the Sponge Bob set. Imagine, if the judge is
confirmed, four year olds across America will hold ground when being taken
to bed before 9, citing judicial precendent the night of July 19 2005,
"well if John Roberts Jr could stay up late, then I can, too." After all,
who would want to argue with the decision of a Supreme Court judicial
nominee.
BIO: DC Photojournalist Carrie Devorah once upon a time contributed as a
comedy writer to Joan Rivers. "Then I realized that life is funnier than
anything I could even dream up." Devorah currently captures life in
stills, and motion. www.carriedevorah.com
|
| |
|