|
|
FREEDOM TO INCITE HATE |
Hate crimes are rising in America. Motivated from hostility to color,
creed, gender or sexual orientation, they are encouraged by inconsistent
views of freedom of press.
Monday December 6, the Express, Washington Post's commuter giveaway ran
two photos of Warren Beatty and Secretary of State Colin Powell on the
"People" page, Outlook Section. Beatty, a Kennedy Center honoree and
Powell, US Secretary of State, are pictured, by AP photographer J Scott
Applewhite, sharing a giggle. AP was invited beyond the Open Press red
velvet cording, by the White House, and country, to photograph amongst
the honorees, assuring maximum coverage of the Kennedy Center's annual
event. Beatty, pictured finger pointing to the sky, Powell howling, the
Express headline editor titled the segment, "LAUGHS,", "Then Condi Said
To The Rabbi."
In a city and culture sensitive to anti-Semitism and racism, politically
charged by terrorism, the headline was not only ill conceived but
reflective of editorial bias. The chosen headline could have been "Did
you hear the one about." or used other images with less opportunity to
offend or incite. Other guests at the event I photographically covered
included colourful moments provided Robert Downey Jr , Lou Gossett Jr,
Ruby Dee, Ossie Davis, Kid Rock, Bo Derek, Faye Dunaway, Sir Elton John
and partner David Furnish, ambassadors and Kennedy Center patrons.
Abusing privilege with tactlessness is inappropriate behaviour from
media. Freedom of press is not a right to insult or incite in print or
online. Understanding the nature of those who commit hate crimes is
quite simple. Hate crimes are message crimes committed by "average
people," Dr. Jack McDevitt, a criminologist, says " sending a message to
members of a certain group that they are unwelcome." "Hate in
literature" is only one forum amongst many from which their inflammatory
ideas can be taken that are dangerous, indecent, ugly, harmful, or
offensive. Contrary to popular belief they are not committed by hate
group conspiracists. Most are committed by lone wolves acting with one
maybe two others. Defined as "actions intended to harm or intimidate
people because of their race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, religion,
or other minority group status" hate crimes are criminal. The vast
majority of hate crimes are simple assault, no serious injury occurring
and no weapon used, or intimidation, the use of threatening words or
conduct. The National Institute of Mental Health reports hate crimes
have more serious psychological effects than non-bias motivated crimes.
The FBI provides an annual report on crime statistics submitted from
more than 11,900 law enforcement agencies around the country. In 2003,
16% of those agencies reported hate crimes in their jurisdictions during
2003. The 7,400 hate crimes were reported with more than half of those
crimes reported, religious in motivation, mostly targeting Jews and
blacks. Federal, state and local law enforcement agencies have different
definitions of hate crimes along with different ways of recording
reported information. Hate crimes may be misfiled, not cross referenced
from assault and battery, arson, vandalism, property destruction,
intimidation, burglary and theft. Or even filed at all.
In the case of a mid '20's Washingtonian African male assaulted by five
adult males soon after leaving a Washington Navy Yard area Gay bar, the
incident reported in his home Maryland district was not recorded by his
police department nor referred back to DC as an incident, a hate crime,
gay crime, or even, in light of the "5 against 1" odds, an assault. In
Long Island over the Thanksgiving weekend, a racially mixed husband and
wife had a cross burned on their front lawn. December 6th, over 40 homes
in Indian Head, Maryland were burned, initially reported as possible
eco-terrorism, still being confirmed is the one report mentioning an
occurrence of anti-black graffiti prior to the incident. The Hunters
Brooke development has a black constituency.
Is this an overreaction to a headline. Not at all. The Post demonstrates
lack of understanding of their role of unrestricted speech for the press
in our democratic system. As with beauty, it is in the eye of the
beholder or is this case, in the mind of the reader.. remember Burford O
Burrow who opened fire at a Jewish Community Center. His friends and
neighbors described him as just a nice regular everyday guy. Until he
read
something. Somewhere. And opened fire..
Maybe the next headline will be "did you hear the one about the Jewish
Group and the Black Group that decided to sue the media.." Or that an
apology is issued. Now, that could be funny.
BIO: Carrie Devorah is an award winning investigative photojournalist
cross credentialed as a Crime Information Analyst, profiler, security
and mediator. She covered international horseracing and boxing before
returning to America writing on issues related to Faith, Homeland
Security and International Terrorism. Devorah is a member of the
National Press Club.
|
| |
|